Free Reports

This report aggregates information for the housing of clients before and after entering shelters. It displays housing type prior to intake, reason for service, housing type after discharge, and reason for discharge.

This report displays a list of clients who received services within a specified date range at specified Service Providers. The report then displays mandatory modules (defined by York Region) and indicates whether the module contains any data or not.

This report was developed for the City of Ottawa to show a list of all clients that had stayed in selected shelter(s) during a specified date range. The report lists clients, grouped by household, and displays each client's family role for that household, along with each family member's date of birth, admission date, and discharge date. 

This report was developed for the City of Ottawa to show a list of all clients that had stayed in selected shelter(s) during a specified date range. The report lists clients, grouped by household, and displays each client's family role for that household, along with each family member's date of birth, admission date, and discharge date. 

This simple report takes all clients who have stayed in the selected shelter(s) in the date range, and counts the total number of nights they stayed in shelter during that date range. The graph then sorts the clients by the total number of nights in shelter during the range. Note that this report works best if you select a long date range, like 1 year.

This report is a free tool that's a companion to my data wizardry presentation, You're Probably Lying About Homelessness, which you can watch on the webinars archive page.

This report examines the number of open cases to determine current caseload. It is a tool for communities which are delivering case management services to people experiencing homelessness, to examine whether caseloads are balanced across case managers, and whether overall caseloads meet established standards.

This report was commissioned by the City of Brantford to act as their prioritization list. It builds on the Coordinated Access module in HIFIS 4.0.59, and includes some additional features. Some of these modifications include: Contributing Factors, trimorbidity, current Case goal and caseworker, Family size, approaching inactivity, and presence on a Waiting List.

This report was commissioned by the Region of Durham to act as their prioritization list. It builds on the Coordinated Access module in HIFIS 4.0.59, and includes some additional features. Some of these modifications include: date and location consent was signed at, approaching inactivity, date Housing History was updated, trimorbidity, trauma/abuse, family reunification, and a unique prioritization formula.

This report was commissioned by the County of Lambton to act as their prioritization list. It builds on the Coordinated Access module in HIFIS 4.0.59, and includes some additional features. Some of these modifications include: bypassing the default calculation of chronicity, pulling out some fields from the VI-SPDAT, and using Reason for Service data to determine institutional discharges.

• Contributing Factors, 
• Turnaways, 
• client creation date, 
• most recent service provider interaction, 
• consent type, and 
• most recent city.

This is Waterloo's prioritization list, which pulls data from a Waiting List called PATHS, and includes the following data: name, household type, household size, gender, age, status (Waiting List Priority), caseworker, VI-SPDAT score, SPDAT score, date added to waiting list, date removed from waiting list, days on waiting list, chronic status, trimorbidity (derived from VI-SPDAT), risk (derived from VI-SPDAT), critical safety (derived from Watch Concern), previous shelter, CHAC (presence on another Waiting List), housing preferences (from Custom Table).